Voting Comments
Least Flycatcher
#38-B-10
1st Round: 6-1
2nd Round: 6-1
|
1st Round |
2nd Round |
|
16 July 2010 I don’t feel there is enough detail in the physical description or the description of the vocalizations to eliminate other Empids. Given the observer’s experience he is likely correct but I’d like to see more details to support a difficult identification like this. |
6 September 2010
same comments |
|
07-20-2010
Plumage and song described well. |
12/03/2010
same comments as before |
|
07-28-2010
Sounds convincing but a couple clarifications: the 'che-bec' is the LEFL song, not 'call' (and, though I have no doubt about Dave's ID, it would have been helpful to hear that the song was given repetitively). Also, I'm not sure that an almond-shaped eye-ring is a great fieldmark for this species (at least not nearly as important as the short wings & tail and voice that were mentioned) given that "Western" Flycatchers have a much more prominently almond-shaped eye-ring and that, in my experience, other Empids can show that to the same degree as LEFLs. |
09-12-2010
I remain convinced |
|
07-29-2010
Description, including the call note fits that of the Least Flycatcher. The observer is familiar with the similar species (both in plumage and their song) in the genus Empidonax. |
010-25-2010
I'm still convinced. |
|
7-30-10
The call/song is distinctive. |
10-9-10
I still feel that Dave is a careful observer and knows a "CHE-bek" when he hears it. |
|
08-07-2010
I'm convinced. |
09-13-2010
Although I gave a lot of thought to the legitimate concerns expressed by Cliff and Jay about this rare bird report, I finally decided to accept the record again |
|
17 July 2010
Distinctive vocalization. |
10 October 2010
Same comments as first round. |