Voting Comments
Record #: 29-B-06
Least Flycatcher
1st Round: (5-2)
2nd Round: (4-3)
3rd Round:
(7-0)
ACCEPT
|
1st Round |
2nd Round |
3rd Round |
| 05-04-2007. Shirley Sturts -- Accept "Chebek" call heard by observer familiar with the different Empidonax calls |
06-22-2007 Sturts -- Accept I am staying with my vote for the same reasons I voted to accept on round 1. |
08-03-2007. Sturts -- Accept I'm staying with my first two accept votes for the same reason - call is diagnostic. |
| 05-05-2007. Carlisle -- Accept would have been nice to see more details on the '2-part' song (i.e. an emphatic che-bek' ...) but sufficient. |
6-30-07. Carlisle -- Accept Still feel that a better voice description is needed (can we ask for that?) but that Lisa heard a Least. |
11-04-2007. Carlisle -- Accept The more particular song description is helpful |
| 05-06-2007. chuck trost -- Reject, specific identification not established No visual obtained, and one observer. while possibly a LEFL, I'm not convinced by the data presented. |
07-02-2007. chuck trost -- Reject, specific identification not established I still need more of a description, perhaps just of the call heard, to be convinced. |
08-07-2007. chuck trost -- Accept I'm switching my vote after reading a description of the "song." |
| 5/9/07. Cliff Weisse -- Accept Althought the description is lacking details of the song the observer is experienced with Least Flycatcher and the species was previously recorded at the location. |
7/3/07. Cliff Weisse -- Reject, specific identification not established After reading the first round comments I agree with Dave, there is no description of the bird and very limited detail of the song. Although I believe that Lisa heard a Least Flycatcher I think we need to see more detail of the song. |
8/4/07. Cliff Weisse -- Accept I have always felt that Lisa's identification was correct. My hesitation was due to a lack of documentation rather than any doubt about Lisa's ID of the birds. The addition of a description of the song is enough to sway my vote back to accept. |
| 5/21/07. Charles Swift -- Accept Voice description adequate - I guess even if the bird was not seen! |
7/7/06. Charles Swift -- Accept See round 1 comments. |
10/8/2007. Charles Swift -- Accept Thanks to Lisa for the additional information. |
| 05-27-2007. Dave Trochlell -- Reject, specific identification not established Unfortunately, as in 30-B-06, Lisa does not describe the bird in any way, and that gives me nothing on which to make my judgement. My absolute minimum here is that I require some description of the LEFL's song. This is too bad, because I'm confident that Lisa saw or heard this species. |
06-30-2007. Dave Trochlell -- Reject, specific identification not established As stated earlier, I can't accept this candidate because of the lack of an adequate description. |
08-10-2007. Dave Trochlell -- Accept With the addition of LEFL vocalizations in Lisa's addendum, I'm ready to accept 29-B-06 and 30-B-06. |
| 27 May 2007. Hardy -- Accept The description is admittedly deficient, but this is my record and I have no doubt that what I heard was a LEFL. |
1 July 2007. Hardy -- Accept Same comment as previous. | 6 August 2007. Hardy -- Accept same comment |