Voting Comments
Broad-winged Hawk
Record #39-B-10
1st Round: 5-2
2nd Round: 3-4
3rd Round: 3-4
|
3rd Round |
|
6 November 2010
Same comments |
|
12/03/2010
questionable see previous comments |
|
5 December 2010
|
|
11-22-2010
no change from round 2 |
|
12-06-2010
same comments |
|
11-28-10
I feel that more energy should have been spent on eliminating other buteos. |
|
11-08-2010
I'm going to vote again to reject this record for reasons already stated. |
|
1st Round |
2nd Round |
|
16 July 2010 |
6 September 2010
The written description fits Red-shouldered Hawk so that species cannot be eliminated as a possibility. |
|
07-20-2010
Plumage, behavior, and habitat that are described support the identification of Broad-winged Hawk. |
10/11/2010
After re-reading the report and others votes. I've changed to reject because I also don't believe Red-tailed or Red-shouldered Hawk were completely eliminated. |
|
17 July 2010
While some significant details are missing from this report, such as the wing vs. tail length on perched bird, and throat/breast coloring, description is sufficient to eliminate accipiters and other buteos. |
10 October 2010
Same comments as first round. |
|
07-28-2010
I would have liked to have seen separation from a Red-shouldered Hawk (to me, the most similar Buteo) but otherwise convincing. Also, let's be clear that the bird described is a 1-yr-old (or second-calendar-year) bird ... not a "1st-year". |
09-12-2010
While I agree that the report could have dealt better with other Buteos (RSHA, RTHA, etc.), the bird sounds like a Broad-winged - especially the small size and the short, broad wings. |
|
07-29-2010
Description fits that of the Broad-winged Hawk and similar hawks are eliminated. The observer indicates that he is familiar with the species. |
010-25-2010
I'm staying with my accept vote. |
|
7-30-10
Sounds convincing to me. |
10-9-10
I have to agree with Cliff and Dave that the description does not eliminate RSHA or SWHA, and a small RTHA is not considered. So, I'm switching my vote. |
|
08-07-2010
This could very well have been a BWHA, as claimed, but I wasn't completely convinced because the report did not adequately compete the sighting against other possible buteos, notably RSHA, SWHA, and RTHA. |
09-13-2010
For the second round I'll continue to reject this record for reasons previously stated. |